If you were to Google "free porn sites", I bet you'd get an assload of sites (which I'm betting most of you visit anyways). So why is Flickr overlooked?
Oh, yes... Flickr is almost becoming "pornish" if you look or search in the right places. Not knocking the idea but, who's to say who's looking for things like "boobs","ass", ect.? Adults? Fine and dandy. Kids? Well, Flickr is supposed to have a filter for anyone underage on the site. The problem? Kids will tend to lie to see nudity.
Most of the time, it's usually art like nudity. But there can be some stuff that's... Well... pornififfic or borderline. Usually the majority of the nude posters are promoting their talents to maybe become an amateur whore... I mean, "model".
Here's a tip: If you want to be a model, try calling Sears and ask if you can model their clothes in their sale papers.
Done and done.
(I'm not against it all. Just wanted to say it out loud.)
Comments [0]